Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport
Volume 12, Issue 5 , Pages 518-525, September 2009

A hitchhiker's guide to assessing young people's physical activity: Deciding what method to use

  • James Dollman

      Affiliations

    • University of South Australia, Nutritional Physiology Research Centre, School of Health Sciences, City East Campus, Adelaide, SA, Australia
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.
  • ,
  • Anthony D. Okely

      Affiliations

    • University of Wollongong, Faculty of Education, Child Obesity Research Centre, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
  • ,
  • Louise Hardy

      Affiliations

    • University of Sydney, School of Public Health, NSW Centre for Overweight and Obesity, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
  • ,
  • Anna Timperio

      Affiliations

    • Deakin University, Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition Research, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Burwood, VIC, Australia
  • ,
  • Jo Salmon

      Affiliations

    • Deakin University, Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition Research, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Burwood, VIC, Australia
  • ,
  • Andrew P. Hills

      Affiliations

    • Queensland University of Technology, School of Human Movement Studies, Kelvin Grove Campus, Kelvin Grove, QLD, Australia

Received 3 June 2008; received in revised form 10 September 2008; accepted 11 September 2008.

Abstract 

Researchers and practitioners interested in assessing physical activity in children are often faced with the dilemma of what instrument to use. While there is a plethora of physical activity instruments to choose from, there is currently no guide regarding the suitability of common assessment instruments. The purpose of this paper is to provide a user's guide for selecting physical activity assessment instruments appropriate for use with children and adolescents. While recommendations regarding specific instruments are not provided, the guide offers information about key attributes and considerations for the use of eight physical activity assessment approaches: heart rate monitoring; accelerometry; pedometry; direct observation; self-report; parent report; teacher report; and diaries/logs. Attributes of instruments and other factors to be considered in the selection of assessment instruments include: population (age); sample size; respondent burden; method/delivery mode; assessment time frame; physical activity information required (data output); data management; measurement error; cost (instrument and administration) and other limitations. A decision flow chart has been developed to assist researchers and practitioners to select an appropriate method of assessing physical activity. Five real-life scenarios are presented to illustrate this process in light of key instrument attributes. It is important that researchers, practitioners and policy makers understand the strengths and limitations of different methods of assessing physical activity, and are guided on selection of the most appropriate instrument/s to suit their needs.

Keywords: Physical activity, Measurement, Self-report, Methodology, Assessment

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1440-2440(08)00193-X

doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2008.09.007

Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport
Volume 12, Issue 5 , Pages 518-525, September 2009