Journal Home
Search for

Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages 429-433 (July 2010)


View previous. 12 of 19 View next.

Strength increases in upper and lower body are larger with longer inter-set rest intervals in trained men

Belmiro Freitas de Sallesa, Roberto SimãobCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Humberto Mirandab, Martim Bottaroc, Fabio Fontanad, Jeffrey M. Willardsone

Received 22 December 2008; received in revised form 4 June 2009; accepted 19 August 2009. published online 08 October 2009.

Abstract 

The purpose of the current study was to compare different rest interval durations on upper and lower body strength. Thirty-six recreationally trained men were randomly assigned to 1min (G1; n=12), 3min (G3; n=12) or 5min (G5; n=12) rest interval groups. Each group performed the same resistance training program. Maximal strength was assessed at baseline, mid-point (8 weeks) and post-training (16 weeks) for the bench press and leg press exercises. For the bench press, significant increases were demonstrated within G3 and G5 at 8 weeks and at 16 weeks versus baseline (p<0.05). Additionally, for the bench press, G5 (98.2±3.7kg) was significantly stronger than G1 (92.5±3.8kg) at 16 weeks (p<0.05). For the leg press, significant increases were demonstrated within all groups at 8 weeks and at 16 weeks versus baseline (p<0.05). Additionally, for the leg press, G5 (290.8±23.5kg) was significantly stronger than G1 (251.0±15.8kg) at 8 weeks (p<0.01) and G3 (305.0±23.9kg) and G5 (321.7±21.7kg) were significantly stronger than G1 (276.7±10.7kg) at 16 weeks (p<0.05). The findings of the current study indicate that utilising 3 or 5min rest intervals between sets may result in significantly greater increases in upper and lower body strength beyond the initial weeks of training versus utilising 1-min rest intervals between sets.

a Laboratory for Clinical and Experimental Research in Vascular Biology (BioVasc), Biomedical Center, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

b Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, School of Physical Education and Sports, Brazil

c College of Physical Education, University of Brasília, Brazil

d School of Health, Physical Education, and Leisure Services, University of Northern Iowa, USA

e Kinesiology and Sports Studies Department, Eastern Illinois University, USA

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.

PII: S1440-2440(09)00176-5

doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2009.08.002


View previous. 12 of 19 View next.