« Previous
Next »
Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport
Volume 13, Issue 6
, Pages 646-650
, November 2010
Comparison of methods for kinematic identification of footstrike and toe-off during overground and treadmill running
References
- Local dynamic stability versus kinematic variability of continuous overground and treadmill walking. J Biomech Eng. 2001;123(1):27–32
- A kinematic comparison of overground and treadmill walking. Clin Biomech. 1998;13(6):434–440
- . Two simple methods for determining gait events during treadmill walking using kinematic data. Gait Posture. 2008;27(4):710–714
- A comparison of overground and treadmill running for measuring three-dimensional kinematics of the lumbo-pelvic-hip complex. Clin Biomech. 2001;16(8):667–680
- . Phase determination during normal running using kinematic data. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2002;38(5):503–506
- . Ground reaction forces in distance running. J Biomech. 1980;13(5):397–406
- Kinematics of normal locomotion—a statistical study based on TV data. J Biomech. 1974;7(6):479–486
- Kinematic-based technique for event time determination during gait. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1990;28(4):355–360
- . Identifying heel contact and toe-off using forceplate thresholds with a range of digital-filter cutoff frequencies. J Appl Biomech. 2003;19(2):178–184
PII: S1440-2440(10)00078-2
doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2010.03.006
© 2010 Sports Medicine Australia. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport
Volume 13, Issue 6
, Pages 646-650
, November 2010

