Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport
Volume 15, Issue 2 , Pages 110-115, March 2012

Injury risk associated with ground hardness in junior cricket

  • Dara M. Twomey

      Affiliations

    • School of Human Movement and Sport Sciences, University of Ballarat, Australia
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.
  • ,
  • Peta E. White

      Affiliations

    • School of Human Movement and Sport Sciences, University of Ballarat, Australia
    • Australian Centre for Research into Injury in Sport and its Prevention (ACRISP), Monash Injury Research Institute (MIRI), Monash University, Australia
  • ,
  • Caroline F. Finch

      Affiliations

    • School of Human Movement and Sport Sciences, University of Ballarat, Australia
    • Australian Centre for Research into Injury in Sport and its Prevention (ACRISP), Monash Injury Research Institute (MIRI), Monash University, Australia

Received 25 January 2011; received in revised form 27 June 2011; accepted 5 August 2011. published online 28 September 2011.

Abstract 

Objectives

To establish if there is an association between ground hardness and injury risk in junior cricket.

Design

Nested case-series of players who played matches on specific grounds with objective ground hardness measures, within a prospective cohort study of junior community club cricket players.

Methods

Monitoring of injuries and playing exposure occurred during 434 matches over the 2007/2008 playing season. Objective assessment of the hardness of 38 grounds was undertaken using a Clegg hammer at 13 sites on 19 different junior cricket grounds on the match eve across the season. Hardness readings were classified from unacceptably low (<30g) to unacceptably high (>120g) and two independent raters assessed the likelihood of each injury being related to ground hardness. Injuries sustained on tested grounds were related to the ground hardness measures.

Results

Overall, 31 match injuries were reported; 6.5% were rated as likely to be related to ground hardness, 16.1% as possibly related and 74.2% as unlikely to be related and 3.2% unknown. The two injuries likely to be related to ground hardness were sustained whilst diving to catch a ball resulting, in a graze/laceration from contact with hard ground. Overall, 31/38 (82%) ground assessments were rated as having ‘unacceptably high’ hardness and all others as ‘high/normal’ hardness. Only one injury occurred on an objectively tested ground.

Conclusions

It remains unclear if ground hardness is a contributing factor to the most common injury mechanism of being struck by the ball, and needs to be confirmed in future larger-scale studies.

Keywords: Ground hardness, Junior cricket, Clegg hammer, Injury risk

 

PII: S1440-2440(11)00155-1

doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2011.08.005

Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport
Volume 15, Issue 2 , Pages 110-115, March 2012