Advertisement

In-shoe plantar pressure distribution during running on natural grass and asphalt in recreational runners

Published:September 30, 2009DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2008.07.008

      Abstract

      The type of surface used for running can influence the load that the locomotor apparatus will absorb and the load distribution could be related to the incidence of chronic injuries. As there is no consensus on how the locomotor apparatus adapts to loads originating from running surfaces with different compliance, the objective of this study was to investigate how loads are distributed over the plantar surface while running on natural grass and on a rigid surface—asphalt. Forty-four adult runners with 4 ± 3 years of running experience were evaluated while running at 12 km/h for 40 m wearing standardised running shoes and Pedar insoles (Novel). Peak pressure, contact time and contact area were measured in six regions: lateral, central and medial rearfoot, midfoot, lateral and medial forefoot. The surfaces and regions were compared by three ANOVAS (2 × 6). Asphalt and natural grass were statistically different in all variables. Higher peak pressures were observed on asphalt at the central (p < 0.001) [grass: 303.8(66.7) kPa; asphalt: 342.3(76.3) kPa] and lateral rearfoot (p < 0.001) [grass: 312.7(75.8) kPa; asphalt: 350.9(98.3) kPa] and lateral forefoot (p < 0.001) [grass: 221.5(42.9) kPa; asphalt: 245.3(55.5) kPa]. For natural grass, contact time and contact area were significantly greater at the central rearfoot (p < 0.001). These results suggest that natural grass may be a surface that provokes lighter loads on the rearfoot and forefoot in recreational runners.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Tillman M.D.
        • Fiolkowski P.
        • Bauer J.A.
        • Reisinger K.D.
        In-shoe plantar measurements during running on different surfaces: changes in temporal and kinetic parameters.
        Sports Eng. 2002; 5: 121-128
        • Novacheck T.F.
        The biomechanics of running.
        Gait Posture. 1998; 7: 77-95
        • van Gent R.N.
        • Siem D.
        • van Middelkoop M.
        • van Os A.G.
        • Bierma-Zeinstra S.M.
        • Koes B.W.
        Incidence and determinants of lower extremity running injuries in long distance runners: a systematic review.
        Br J Sports Med. 2007; 41 ([discussion 480]): 469-480
        • Dixon S.J.
        • Collop A.C.
        • Batt M.E.
        Surface effects on ground reaction forces and lower extremity kinematics in running.
        Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000; 32: 1919-1926
        • Derrick T.R.
        The effects of knee contact angle on impact forces and accelerations.
        Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004; 36: 832-837
        • Milner C.E.
        • Ferber R.
        • Pollard C.D.
        • Hamill J.
        • Davis I.S.
        Biomechanical factors associated with tibial stress fracture in female runners.
        Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006; 38: 323-328
        • McClay I.
        • Manal K.
        A comparison of three-dimensional lower extremity kinematics during running between excessive pronators and normals.
        Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1998; 13: 195-203
        • Willems T.M.
        • Witvrouw E.
        • De Cock A.
        • De Clercq D.
        Gait-related risk factors for exercise-related lower-leg pain during shod running.
        Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007; 39: 330-339
        • Feehery Jr., R.V.
        The biomechanics of running on different surfaces.
        Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 1986; 3: 649-659
        • Ferris D.P.
        • Liang K.
        • Farley C.T.
        Runners adjust leg stiffness for their first step on a new running surface.
        J Biomech. 1999; 32: 787-794
        • Ferris D.P.
        • Louie M.
        • Farley C.T.
        Running in the real world: adjusting leg stiffness for different surfaces.
        Proc Biol Sci. 1998; 265: 989-994
        • Bloom M.
        Judging a path by its cover: not all running surfaces are created equal. So we’ve rated 10 of them, giving you the pros and cons of each.
        Runner’s World. 1997; 32: 54-58
        • Hardin E.C.
        • van den Bogert A.J.
        • Hamill J.
        Kinematic adaptations during running: effects of footwear, surface, and duration.
        Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004; 36: 838-844
        • Eils E.
        • Streyl M.
        • Linnenbecker S.
        • Thorwesten L.
        • Volker K.
        • Rosenbaum D.
        Characteristic plantar pressure distribution patterns during soccer-specific movements.
        Am J Sports Med. 2004; 32: 140-145
        • Wong P.L.
        • Chamari K.
        • Mao D.W.
        • Wisloff U.
        Higher plantar pressure on the medial side in four soccer-related movements.
        Br J Sports Med. 2006;
        • Ford K.R.
        • Manson N.A.
        • Evans B.J.
        • Myer G.D.
        • Gwin R.C.
        • Heidt Jr., R.S.
        • et al.
        Comparison of in-shoe foot loading patterns on natural grass and synthetic turf.
        J Sci Med Sport. 2006; 9: 433-440
        • Kernozek T.W.
        • Zimmer K.A.
        Reliability and running speed effects of in-shoe loading measurements during slow treadmill running.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2000; 21: 749-752
        • Dixon S.J.
        Application of center-of-pressure data to indicate rearfoot inversion–eversion in shod running.
        J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2006; 96: 305-312
        • Cavanagh P.
        • Ulbrecht J.
        Biomechanical aspects of foot problems in diabetes.
        in: Boulton A. The foot in diabetes. Ed. Chichester, United Kingdom1994: 25-35
        • Dixon S.
        • James I.
        Player surface-interaction.
        in: Launch seminar of the SportSURF network, Loughborough, UK2005
        • Kerdok A.E.
        • Biewener A.A.
        • McMahon T.A.
        • Weyand P.G.
        • Herr H.M.
        Energetics and mechanics of human running on surfaces of different stiffnesses.
        J Appl Physiol. 2002; 92: 469-478
        • Taunton J.E.
        • Ryan M.B.
        • Clement D.B.
        • McKenzie D.C.
        • Lloyd-Smith D.R.
        • Zumbo B.D.
        A retrospective case–control analysis of 2002 running injuries.
        Br J Sports Med. 2002; 36: 95-101
        • Wen D.Y.
        • Puffer J.C.
        • Schmalzried T.P.
        Lower extremity alignment and risk of overuse injuries in runners.
        Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1997; 29: 1291-1298