Original research| Volume 16, ISSUE 2, P124-128, March 2013

Download started.


Calibration of the GENEA accelerometer for assessment of physical activity intensity in children



      The purpose of the study was to establish activity intensity cut-points for the GENEA accelerometer via calibration with oxygen consumption ( V ˙ O 2 ).


      The study was a lab-based validation and calibration study.


      Forty-four children, aged 8–14 years, completed eight activities (ranging from lying supine to a medium paced run) whilst wearing GENEA accelerometers at three locations (each wrist and at the right hip), an ActiGraph GT1M at the hip and a portable gas analyser. ActiGraph output and V ˙ O 2 were used for assessment of concurrent and criterion validity, respectively. Pearson's r correlations were used to assess validity of the GENEA monitors at each location and location-specific activity intensity cut-points were established via Receiver Operator Characteristic curve analysis.


      The GENEA showed good criterion validity at both wrist locations (right: r = .900; left: r = .910, both p < 0.01), although the hip-mounted monitor demonstrated significantly higher criterion validity (r = .965, p < 0.05). Similar results were shown for concurrent validity (right: r = .830; left: r = .845; hip: r = .985, all p < 0.01). GENEAs, irrespective of wear location, accurately discriminated between all activity intensities (sedentary, light, moderate and vigorous) with the hip mounted monitor recording the largest area under the curve for each intensity (area under the curve = 0.94–0.99).


      The GENEA can be used to accurately assess children's physical activity intensity when worn at either the wrist or the hip.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Trost S.
        • Pate R.
        • Freedson P.
        • et al.
        Using objective physical activity measures with youth: how many days of monitoring are needed?.
        Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000; 32: 426-431
        • Colley R.
        • Gorber S.C.
        • Tremblay M.
        Quality control and data reduction procedures for accelerometry-derived measures of physical activity.
        Health Rep. 2010; 21: 63-64
        • Crocker P.R.E.
        • Holowachuk D.R.
        • Kowalski K.C.
        Feasibility of using the tritrac motion sensor over a 7-day trial with older children.
        Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2001; 13: 70-81
        • Troiano R.
        • Berrigan D.
        • Dodd K.
        • et al.
        Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer.
        Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008; 40: 181-188
        • Evenson K.R.
        • Terry J.W.
        Assessment of differing definitions of accelerometer non-wear time.
        Res Q Exerc Sport. 2009; 80: 355-362
        • Esliger D.W.
        • Rowlands A.V.
        • Hurst T.L.
        • et al.
        Validation of the GENEA accelerometer.
        Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011; 43: 1085-1093
        • Van Hees V.T.
        • Renström F.
        • Wright A.
        • et al.
        Estimation of daily energy expenditure in pregnant and non-pregnant women using a wrist worn tri-axial accelerometer.
        PLoS ONE. 2011; 6: e22922
        • McLaughlin J.E.
        • King G.A.
        • Howley E.T.
        • et al.
        Validation of the cosmed K4B2 portable metabolic system.
        Int J Sports Med. 2001; 22: 280-284
        • Puyau M.R.
        • Adolph A.L.
        • Vohra F.A.
        • et al.
        Validation and calibration of physical activity monitors in children.
        Obes Res. 2002; 10: 150-157
        • Karantonis D.M.
        • Narayanan M.R.
        • Mathie M.
        • et al.
        Implementation of a real-time human movement classifier using a triaxial accelerometer for ambulatory monitoring.
        IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2006; 10: 156-167
        • Stevens J.
        • Repeated measures analysis, Chapter 13
        Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences.
        4th ed. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey2002 (p. 520–521)
        • Meng X.L.
        • Rosenthal R.
        • Rubin D.B.
        Comparing correlated correlation coefficients.
        Psychol Bull. 1992; 111: 172-175
        • Harrell J.
        • McMurray R.
        • Bagget C.
        • et al.
        Energy costs of physical activity in children and adolescents.
        Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005; 37: 329-336
        • Mathie M.J.
        • Coster A.C.F.
        • Lovell N.H.
        • et al.
        Accelerometry: providing an integrated, practical method for long term, ambulatory monitoring of human movement.
        Physiol Meas. 2004; 25: R1-R20
        • Reilly J.J.
        • Penpraze V.
        • Hislop J.
        • et al.
        Objective measurement of physical activity and sedentary behaviour: review with new data.
        Arch Dis Child. 2008; 93: 614-619
        • Trost S.G.
        • Pate R.R.
        • Sallis J.F.
        • et al.
        Age and gender differences in objectively measured physical activity in youth.
        Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002; 34: 350-355