Advertisement

PACE: A group randomised controlled trial to increase children's break-time playground physical activity

      Abstract

      Objectives

      To assess the effect of a school playground intervention on the physical activity levels of primary/elementary aged children.

      Design

      Two-arm parallel group randomized controlled trial.

      Methods

      In 2011, children aged 4–13 years from thirteen primary/elementary schools (in Illawarra, New South Wales, Australia) were invited to participate in the study. School recruitment was based on existing policies, equipment and willingness to participate. Participating schools were randomly allocated to the intervention or control using the ‘hat and draw’ method. The intervention was delivered over four months. Intervention schools introduced policy changes and portable equipment to break-time after baseline measures were collected. The primary outcome was the proportion of break-time spent in Moderate to Vigorous Physical Activity (MVPA) assessed by the System for Observing Playground Activity in Youth (SOPLAY). The analysis involved linear mixed models adjusting for the clustering effect of schools. The study is registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12614001128684).

      Results

      Four schools (two intervention and two control) met the inclusion criteria (1582 children: 790 males; 267 controls, total of 792 females; 248 controls). Students from the intervention schools had a greater increase at follow-up in the proportion of break-time in MVPA; (adjusted difference = 12.5 percentage points, 95% CI [−13.0%, 38.0%]; P = 0.17; r = 0.6) compared to the controls. MVPA at recess significantly increased (adjusted difference = 18.0 percentage points, 95% CI [6.9%, 29.1%]; P = 0.02; effect size = 0.7). There were no significant increases in MVPA when examining overall break times. Results were greater for girls compared to boys.

      Conclusions

      Making environmental and policy changes are promising strategies for promoting health-enhancing physical activity during school break-time.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      References

        • Janssen I.
        • LeBlanc A.
        Systematic review of the health benefits of physical activity and fitness in school-aged children and youth.
        IJBNPA. 2010; 7: 1-16
        • World Health Organisation
        Global Strategy on Diet.
        Phys Act Health. 2013; (http://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/pa/en/)
        • Pate R.R.
        • Mitchell J.A.
        • Byun W.
        • et al.
        Sedentary behaviour in youth.
        Br J Sports Med. 2011; 45: 906-913
        • Salmon J.
        • Ball K.
        • Crawford D.
        • et al.
        Reducing sedentary behaviour and increasing physical activity among 10-year-old children: overview and process evaluation of the ‘Switch-Play’ intervention.
        Health Promot Int. 2005; 20: 7-17
        • Colley R.C.
        • Garriguet D.
        • Janssen I.
        • et al.
        Physical activity of Canadian children and youth: accelerometer results from the 2007–2009 Canadian Health Measures Survey.
        Health Rep. 2011; 22
        • Council on School Health
        The crucial role of recess in school.
        Pediatrics. 2013; 131: 183-188
        • Ridgers N.D.
        • Salmon J.
        • Parrish A.M.
        • et al.
        Physical activity during school recess: a systematic review.
        Am J Prev Med. 2012; 43: 320-328
        • Parrish A.M.
        • Okely A.D.
        • Stanley R.M.
        • et al.
        The effect of school recess interventions on physical activity.
        Sports Med. 2013; 43: 287-299
        • Verstraete S.J.
        • Cardon G.M.
        • De Clercq D.L.
        • et al.
        Increasing children's physical activity levels during recess periods in elementary schools: the effects of providing game equipment.
        Eur J Public Health. 2006; 16: 415-419
        • Okely A.D.
        • Salmon J.
        • Trost S.G.
        • et al.
        Discussion paper for the development of physical activity recommendations for children under 5 years.
        Australian Department of Health and Ageing, Canberra, Australia2008
        • McKenzie T.L.
        • Marshall S.J.
        • Sallis J.F.
        • et al.
        Leisure-time physical activity in school environments: an observational study using SOPLAY.
        Prev Med. 2000; 30: 70-77
        • McKenzie T.L.
        SOPLAY system for observing play and leisure activity in youth; description and procedures manual D.o.E.a.N. sciences editor.
        San Diego State University, San Diego2006
        • Mc Kenzie T.L.
        System for observing play and leisure activity in youth, description and procedures manual.
        Department of Exercise and Nutritional Sciences, San Diego State University, San Diego2006
        • Bocarro J.N.
        • Kanters M.A.
        • Cerin E.
        • et al.
        School sport policy and school-based physical activity environments and their association with observed physical activity in middle school children.
        Health Place. 2012; 18: 31-38
        • Warburton D.E.R.
        • Charlesworth S.
        • Ivey A.
        • et al.
        A systematic review of the evidence for Canada's physical activity guidelines for adults.
        Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010; 7: 39
        • Ridgers N.D.
        • Stratton G.
        • Fairclough S.J.
        • et al.
        Children's physical activity levels during school recess: a quasi-experimental intervention study.
        IJBNPA. 2007; 4: 19
        • Ridgers N.D.
        • Fairclough S.J.
        • Stratton G.
        Twelve-month effects of a playground intervention on children's morning and lunchtime recess physical activity levels.
        J Phys Act Health. 2010; 7: 167-175
        • Evans J.
        In search of peaceful playgrounds.
        Educ Res Perspect. 2001; 28: 45-56
        • Parrish A.M.
        • Yeatman H.
        • Iverson D.
        • et al.
        Using interviews and peer pairs to better understand how school environments affect young children's playground physical activity levels: a qualitative study.
        Health Educ Res. 2012; 27: 269-280
        • Jones S.
        • Beckmann K.
        • Rayner J.
        Australian primary schools’ sun protection policy and practice: evaluating the impact of the national sunsmart schools program.
        Health Promot J Aust. 2008; 19: 86-90
        • Masso M.
        Policy and practice for preventing skin cancer in children.
        Public Health Nurs. 2006; 23: 361-365
        • Janssen I.
        • LeBlanc A.
        Systematic review of the health benefits of physical activity and fitness in school-aged children and youth.
        Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010; 7: 40
        • Giles-Corti B.
        • English D.R.
        • Costa C.
        • et al.
        Creating sunsmart schools.
        Health Educ Res. 2004; 19: 98-109
        • Garden-Robinson J.
        Crunch & munch program improves food preparation and gardening knowledge and skills.
        J Nutr Educ Behav. 2011; 43: S25
        • Conklin M.
        • Lambert L.
        • Anderson J.
        How long does it take students to eat lunch? A summary of three studies.
        J Child Nutr Manag. 2002; 26: 1-6
        • Parrish A.
        • Russell K.G.
        • Yeatman H.
        • et al.
        What factors influence children's activity?.
        BJSN. 2009; 4: 6-10
        • Tremblay M.S.
        • Warburton D.E.
        • Janssen I.
        • et al.
        New Canadian physical activity guidelines.
        Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2011; 36: 36-46
        • Tremblay M.S.
        • LeBlanc A.G.
        • Kho M.E.
        • et al.
        Systematic review of sedentary behaviour and health indicators in school-aged children and youth.
        Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011; 8: 98