Advertisement
Review| Volume 21, ISSUE 4, P383-397, April 2018

Download started.

Ok

Systematic review of the relationship between 20m shuttle run performance and health indicators among children and youth

Published:August 08, 2017DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2017.08.002

      Highlights

      • 20mSRT performance is favourably associated with aspects of physiological, physical, psychosocial and cognitive health in children and youth.
      • The 20mSRT could be used as a holistic health indicator to help identify children and youth at risk of poor health.
      • 20mSRT performance could be used as a population health indicator to compare the health of children and youth worldwide.

      Abstract

      Objective

      This systematic review aimed to summarize research that assessed the associations between 20 m shuttle run test (20mSRT) performance and indicators of physiological, psychosocial and cognitive health among school-aged children and youth.

      Design

      Systematic review.

      Methods

      Five online databases were used to identify peer-reviewed studies published from 1980 to 2016. Studies were included if they matched these criteria: population (children and youth with a mean age of 5–17 years and/or in Grades 1–12), intervention/exposure (performance on the 20mSRT), and outcomes (health indicators: adiposity, cardiometabolic biomarkers, cognition, mental health, psychosocial health, self-esteem and physical self-perception, quality of life and wellbeing, bone health, musculoskeletal fitness, motor skill development, and injuries and/or harm). Narrative syntheses were applied to describe the results. A lack of homogeneity precluded a meta-analysis approach.

      Results

      Overall, 142 studies that determined an association between 20mSRT performance and a health indicator were identified, representing 319,311 children and youth from 32 countries. 20mSRT performance was favourably associated with indicators of adiposity, and some indicators of cardiometabolic, cognitive, and psychosocial health in boys and girls. Fewer studies examined the relationship between 20mSRT performance and measures of quality of life/wellbeing, mental health and motor skill development, and associations were generally inconsistent. The quality of the evidence ranged from very low to moderate across health indicators.

      Conclusion and Implications

      These findings support the use of the 20mSRT as a holistic indicator of population health in children and youth.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Armstrong N.
        • Tomkinson G.R.
        • Ekelund U.
        Aerobic fitness and its relationship to sport, exercise training and habitual physical activity during youth.
        Brit J Sports Med. 2011; 45: 849-858
        • Ortega F.B.
        • Ruiz J.R.
        • Castillo M.J.
        • et al.
        Physical fitness in childhood and adolescence: a powerful marker of health.
        Int J Obes. 2008; 32: 1-11
        • Högström G.
        • Nordström A.
        • Nordström P.
        High aerobic fitness in late adolescence is associated with a reduced risk of myocardial infraction later in life: a nationwide cohort study in men.
        Eur Heart J. 2014; 35: 3133-3140
        • Högström G.
        • Nordström A.
        • Nordström P.
        Aerobic fitness in late adolescence and the risk of early death: a prospective cohort study of 1.3 million Swedish men.
        Int J Epidemiol. 2015; (Published Online First: 20 December)https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyv321
        • Léger L.
        • Lambert J.
        • Goulet A.
        • et al.
        Capacité aérobie des Québécois de 6 à 17 ans-Test navette de 20 mètres avec paliers de 1 minute Aerobic capacity of 6 to 17 year old Québécois – 20 metre shuttle run test with 1 minute stages.
        Can J Appl Sport Sci. 1984; 9: 64-69
        • Lang J.J.
        • Tremblay M.S.
        • Léger L.
        • et al.
        International variability in 20 m shuttle run performance in children and youth: who are the fittest from a 50-country comparison? A systematic literature review with pooling of aggregate results.
        Sports Med. 2016; (Published Online First: 20 September)
        • Tomkinson G.R.
        • Lang J.J.
        • Tremblay M.S.
        • et al.
        International normative 20 m shuttle run values from 1,142,026 children and youth representing 50 countries.
        Brit J Sports Med. 2016; (Published Online First: May 20th)https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2016-095987
        • Tomkinson G.R.
        • Olds T.S.
        Field tests of fitness.
        in: Armstrong N. van Mechlen W. Paediatric exercise science and medicine. Oxford University Press, New York, NY2000: 109-128
        • Mayorga-Vega M.
        • Aguilar-Soto P.
        • Viciana J.
        Criterion-related validity of the 20-M shuttle run test for estimating cardiorespiratory fitness: a meta-analysis.
        J Sports Sci Med. 2015; 14: 536-547
        • Janssen I.
        • LeBlanc A.G.
        Systematic review of the health benefits of physical activity and fitness in school-aged children and youth.
        Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010; 7: 40
        • Poitras V.J.
        • Gray C.E.
        • Borghese M.M.
        • et al.
        Systematic review of the relationship between objectively measured physical activity and health indicators in school-aged children and youth.
        Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2016; 41: S197-S239
        • Moher D.
        • Liberati A.
        • Tetzlaff J.
        • Altman D.G.
        • The PRISMA group
        Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.
        PLoS Med. 2009; 6: e1000097
        • Schardt C.
        • Adams M.B.
        • Owens T.
        • Keits S.
        • Fontelo P.
        Utilization of the PICO framework to improve searching PubMed for clinical questions.
        BMC Med Inf Decis Mak. 2007; 7: 16
        • Council of Europe
        Eurofit: handbook for the Eurofit tests of physical fitness.
        Council of Europe, Rome1988
        • Mcgowan J.
        • Sampson M.
        • Lefebvre C.
        An evidence based checklist for the peer review of electronic search strategies (PRESS EBC).
        Evid Based Libr Inf Pract. 2010; 5: 149-154
        • Higgins J.
        • Green S.
        Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0.
        The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011 (Available from)
        www.cochrane-handbook.org
        • Guyatt G.H.
        • Oxman A.D.
        • Akl E.A.
        • Kunz R.
        • Vist G.
        • Brozed J.
        • et al.
        GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2011; 64: 383-394
        • Guyatt G.H.
        • Oxman A.D.
        • Kunz R.
        • Brozek J.
        • Alonso-Coello P.
        • Rind D.
        • et al.
        GRADE guidelines: 6. Rating the quality of evidence—imprecision.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2011; 64: 1283-1293
        • Guyatt G.H.
        • Oxman A.D.
        • Kunz R.
        • Woodcock J.
        • Brozek J.
        • Helfand M.
        • et al.
        GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence—inconsistency.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2011; 64: 1294-1302
        • Guyatt G.H.
        • Oxman A.D.
        • Kunz R.
        • Woodcock J.
        • Brozek J.
        • Helfand M.
        • et al.
        GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of the evidence—indirectness.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 12 2011; 64: 1303-1310
        • Guyatt G.H.
        • Oxman A.D.
        • Sultan S.
        • Glasziou P.
        • Akl E.A.
        • Alonso-Coello P.
        • et al.
        GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2011; 64: 1311-1316
      1. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. World population prospects: the 2015 revision, key findings and advance tables. 2015; Working Paper No. ESA/P/WP.241.

        • Rowland T.
        Declining cardiorespiratory fitness in youth: fact or supposition?.
        Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2002; 14: 1-8
        • Olds T.
        • Dollman J.
        Are changes in distance-run performance of Australian children between 1985 and 1997 explained by changes in fatness?.
        Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2004; 16: 201-209
        • Lussier L.
        • Buskirk E.R.
        Effects of an endurance training regimen of assessment of work capacity in prepubertal children.
        Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1977; 301: 734-747
        • Krahenbuhl G.S.
        • Pangrazi R.P.
        • Chomokos E.A.
        Aerobic responses of young boys to submaximal running.
        Res Q. 1979; 50: 413-421
        • Péronnet F.
        • Thibault G.
        Mathematical analysis of running performance and worldrecords.
        J Appl Physiol. 1989; 67: 453-465
        • Sjödin B.
        The relationship among running economy, aerobic power, and onset of blood lactate accumulation in young boys (11–15 years).
        in: Komi P.V. Exercise and sport biology. Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL1982: 57-60
        • Weir A.
        • Rabia S.
        • Ardern C.
        Trusting systematic reviews and meta-analyses: all that glitters is not gold!.
        Brit J Sports Med. 2016; (Published online first:15 October)
        • Léger L.A.
        • Mercier D.
        • Gadoury C.
        • et al.
        The multistage 20 metre shuttle run test for aerobic fitness.
        J Sports Sci. 1988; 6: 93-101
        • Ruiz J.R.
        • Ramirez-Lechuga J.
        • Ortega F.
        • et al.
        Artificial neural network-based equation for estimating VO2max for the 20 m shuttle run test in adolescents.
        Artif Intell Med. 2008; 44: 233-245
      2. Meredith M.D. Welk G.J. FITNESSGRAM/ACTIVITYGRAM test administration manual (updated 4th ed). Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL2010
        • Whiteford H.A.
        • Degenhardt L.
        • Rehm J.
        • et al.
        Global burden of disease attributable to mental and substance use disorders: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010.
        Lancet. 2013; 382: 1575-1586
        • Ruiz J.R.
        • Castro-Pinero J.
        • Artero E.G.
        • et al.
        Predictive validity of health-related fitness in youth: a systematic review.
        Brit J Sports Med. 2009; 43: 909-923