Advertisement

Attitudes, beliefs and knowledge related to doping in different categories of football players

  • Author Footnotes
    1 Contributed equally to this manuscript.
    Jaime Morente-Sánchez
    Footnotes
    1 Contributed equally to this manuscript.
    Affiliations
    Faculty of Sport Science, Department of Physical and Sports Education, University of Granada, Spain
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    1 Contributed equally to this manuscript.
    Thomas Zandonai
    Correspondence
    Corresponding authors.
    Footnotes
    1 Contributed equally to this manuscript.
    Affiliations
    Mind, Brain and Behaviour Research Centre, Department of Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Granada, Spain

    Sport Research Centre, Department of Sport Sciences, Miguel Hernández University, Spain
    Search for articles by this author
  • Mikel Zabala Díaz
    Correspondence
    Corresponding authors.
    Affiliations
    Faculty of Sport Science, Department of Physical and Sports Education, University of Granada, Spain
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    1 Contributed equally to this manuscript.

      Abstract

      Objectives

      The aim of this study was to study and compare attitudes, beliefs and knowledge about doping of footballers, from elite to under-18 categories.

      Design

      The descriptive exploratory design used an instrument combining a validated questionnaire (Performance Enhancement Attitude Scale: PEAS) with qualitative open-ended questions.

      Methods

      A total of 1324 Spanish football players (average age 22.56 ± 5.62 years) from 88 football teams that ranged from elite to under-18 categories: Elite (ELI, n = 304), non-elite Professional (PRO, n = 308), top Amateur (AMA, n = 330), elite Under-18 (U18, n = 334) and elite Female (FEM, n = 48) composed the sample.

      Results

      PEAS overall scores (range 17–102, with higher scores representing more permissive attitudes) was 34.02 ± 11.08. The overall scores for all groups analysed were: FEM: 33.75 ± 14.73; ELI: 30.61 ± 9.91; PRO: 34.23 ± 11.13; AMA: 35.05 ± 10.35; and U18: 35.93 ± 11.50. Significant differences were observed between ELI and PRO (p < 0.001), ELI and AMA (p < 0.001), and ELI and U18 (p < 0.001). 95% of participants did not know the meaning of WADA; 97.4% did not know the Prohibited List; 5% admitted having used banned substances and 23.7% knew dopers.

      Conclusions

      This study showed different an important lack of knowledge about doping and an high levels of supplement use in this sample of footballers assessed. It which clearly reinforces the idea of implementing a wide educational doping prevention programme in football environment.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • The World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA)
        The world anti-doping code.
        (Available from:)2015 (. Accessed 12 October 2018)
        • Petróczi A.
        • Aidman E.
        Measuring explicit attitude toward doping: review of the psychometric properties of the performance enhancement attitude scale.
        Psychol Sport Exerc. 2009; 10: 390-396https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2008.11.001
        • Ntoumanis N.
        • Ng J.Y.Y.
        • Barkoukis V.
        • et al.
        Personal and psychosocial predictors of doping use in physical activity settings: a meta-analysis.
        Sport Med. 2014; 44: 1603-1624https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-014-0240-4
        • Lucidi F.
        • Mallia L.
        • Alivernini F.
        • et al.
        The effectiveness of a new school-based media literacy intervention on adolescents’ doping attitudes and supplements use.
        Front Psychol. 2017; 8: 749https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00749
        • Kim T.
        • Kim Y.H.
        Korean national athletes’ knowledge, practices, and attitudes of doping: a cross-sectional study.
        Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2017; 12: 1-8https://doi.org/10.1186/s13011-017-0092-7
        • Morente-Sánchez J.
        • Zabala M.
        Doping in sport: a review of elite athletes’ attitudes, beliefs, and knowledge.
        Sport Med. 2013; 43: 395-411https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-013-0037-x
        • Kondric M.
        • Sekulic D.
        • Uljevic O.
        • et al.
        Sport nutrition and doping in tennis: an analysis of athletes’attitudes and knowledge.
        J Sport Sci Med. 2013; 12: 290-297
        • Rodek J.
        • Sekulic D.
        • Kondric M.
        Dietary supplementation and doping-related factors in high-level sailing.
        J Int Soc Sport Nutr. 2012; 9: 51
        • Kim J.
        • Lee N.
        • Lee J.
        • et al.
        Dietary supplementation of high performance Korean and Japanese Judoists.
        Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2012; : 23119-23127
        • Morente-Sánchez J.
        • Mateo-March M.
        • Zabala M.
        Attitudes towards doping and related experience in Spanish national cycling teams according to different olympic disciplines.
        PLoS One. 2013; 8e70999
        • Lamberti N.
        • Malagoni A.M.
        • Felisatti M.
        • et al.
        Antidoping attitudes among elite athletes: a cross sectional study in biathlon using a suitably developed questionnaire.
        J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2017; 57: 610-623
        • Barghi T.S.
        • Halabchi F.
        • Dvorak J.
        • et al.
        How the Iranian football coaches and players know about doping?.
        Asian J Sport Med. 2015; 6e24392https://doi.org/10.5812/asjsm.6(2)2015.24392
        • Giraldi G.
        • Unim B.
        • Masala D.
        • et al.
        Knowledge, attitudes and behaviours on doping and supplements in young football players in Italy.
        Public Health. 2015; 129: 1007-1009https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2015.05.008
        • Waddington I.
        • Malcolm D.
        • Roderick M.
        • et al.
        Drug use in english professional football.
        Br J Sports Med. 2005; 39 (e18–e18)
        • Ama P.
        • Betnga B.
        • Moor V.A.
        • et al.
        Football and doping: study of African amateur footballers.
        Br J Sports Med. 2003; 37: 307-310
        • Backhouse S.H.
        • Whitaker L.
        • Patterson L.
        • et al.
        Social psychology of doping in sport: a mixed studies narrative synthesis: commissioned report for the world anti-doping agency. 1. 2015: 263
        • Morente-Sánchez J.
        • Femia-Marzo P.
        • Zabala M.
        Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Spanish version of the Performance Enhancement Attitude Scale (Petróczi, 2002).
        J Sport Sci Med. 2014; 13: 430-438
        • Uvacsek M.
        • Nepusz T.
        • Naughton D.
        • et al.
        Self‐admitted behavior and perceived use of performance‐enhancing vs psychoactive drugs among competitive athletes.
        Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2011; 21: 224-234
        • Nunnally J.C.
        Psychometric theory 3E.
        Tata McGraw-Hill Education, 2010
        • Bloodworth A.J.
        • Petróczi A.
        • Bailey R.
        • et al.
        Doping and supplementation: the attitudes of talented young athletes.
        Scand J Med Sci Sport. 2012; 22: 293-301https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0838.2010.01239.x
        • Bloodworth A.
        • McNamee M.
        Clean Olympians? Doping and anti-doping: the views of talented young British athletes.
        Int J Drug Policy. 2010; 21: 276-282https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2009.11.009
        • Kim J.
        • Kang S.
        • Jung H.
        • et al.
        Dietary supplementation patterns of Korean olympic athletes participating in the Beijing 2008 summer olympic games.
        Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2011; 21: 166-174
        • Lun V.
        • Erdman K.A.
        • Fung T.S.
        • et al.
        Dietary supplementation practices in Canadian high-performance athletes.
        Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2012; 22: 31-37
        • Morente-Sánchez J.
        • Zabala M.
        Knowledge, attitudes and beliefs of technical staff towards doping in Spanish football.
        J Sports Sci. 2015; 33: 1267-1275
        • Striegel H.
        • Vollkommer G.
        • Dickhuth H.
        Combating drug use in competitive sports. An analysis from the athletes’ perspective.
        J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2002; 42: 354-359
        • Zabala M.
        • Sanz L.
        • Durán J.
        Doping and profesional road cycling: perspective of cyclists versus team managers.
        J Sport Sci Med. 2009; 8: 102-103
        • Nieper A.
        Nutritional supplement practices in UK junior national track and field athletes.
        Br J Sports Med. 2005; 39: 645-649
        • Lentillon-Kaestner V.
        • Carstairs C.
        Doping use among young elite cyclists: a qualitative psychosociological approach.
        Scand J Med Sci Sport. 2010; 20: 336-345https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0838.2009.00885.x
        • Zabala M.
        • Atkinson G.
        Looking for the “athlete 2.0”: a collaborative challenge.
        J Sci Cycl. 2012; 1: 1-2
        • Alaranta A.
        • Alaranta H.
        • Holmila J.
        • et al.
        Self-reported attitudes of elite athletes towards doping: differences between type of sport.
        Int J Sports Med. 2006; 27: 842-846
        • Lazuras L.
        • Barkoukis V.
        • Rodafinos A.
        • et al.
        Predictors of doping intentions in elite-level athletes: a social cognition approach.
        J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2010; 32: 694
        • Pitsch W.
        • Emrich E.
        • Klein M.
        Doping in elite sports in Germany: results of a www survey.
        Eur J Sport Soc. 2007; 4: 89-102
        • Petróczi A.
        • Mazanov J.
        • Nepusz T.
        • et al.
        Comfort in big numbers: does over-estimation of doping prevalence in others indicate self-involvement?.
        J Occup Med Toxicol. 2008; 3: 8https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6673-3-19
        • Nicholls A.R.
        • Madigan D.J.
        • Levy A.R.
        A confirmatory factor analysis of the performance enhancement attitude scale for adult and adolescent athletes.
        Psychol Sport Exerc. 2017; 28: 100-104https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2016.10.010
        • Morente-Sánchez J.
        • Zandonai T.
        • Mateo-March M.
        • et al.
        Acute effect of snus on physical performance and perceived.
        Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015; 25: 423-431https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.12321