Advertisement
Original research| Volume 23, ISSUE 2, P176-181, February 2020

Download started.

Ok

From accelerometer output to physical activity intensities in breast cancer patients

Published:September 07, 2019DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2019.09.001

      Abstract

      Objectives

      We aimed to investigate accelerometer output corresponding to physical activity intensity cut-points based on percentage of peak oxygen consumption (%VO2peak) and Metabolic Equivalent of Task (MET) value in women treated for breast cancer.

      Design

      Laboratory study.

      Methods

      Fifty female patients shortly after completion of treatment for breast cancer were included. VO2peak was determined during a cardiopulmonary exercise test. Subsequently, patients performed ten activities with different intensities while wearing an accelerometer on the right hip and a mobile oxycon to assess oxygen consumption. We studied the relationship between energy expenditure (expressed as %VO2peak and MET-value) and accelerometer output (in counts per minute (cpm)) with linear regression analyses. We determined accelerometer output corresponding to physical activity intensity cut-points (40% and 60%VO2peak; 3 and 6 MET) using regression equations.

      Results

      VO2peak was 22.4 mL/kg/min (SD 5.2) and resting metabolic rate was 3.1 mL/kg/min (SD 0.6). Accelerometer output corresponding to the cut-points for moderate (40% VO2peak) and vigorous intensity (60% VO2peak) were 1123 and 1911, respectively. The analyses based on MET-values resulted in accelerometer output of 1189 cpm for the moderate (3 MET) and 2768 cpm for the vigorous intensity cut-point (6 MET).

      Conclusions

      Accelerometer outputs for moderate and vigorous intensity physical activity were lower than commonly used cut-points (i.e. 1952 and 5724 cpm), irrespective of the method used to express energy expenditure (%VO2peak versus MET-value). Thus, categorizing physical activity intensities based on general-population cut-points, may underestimate physical activity intensities for women treated for breast cancer.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Maratia S.
        • Cedillo S.
        • Rejas J.
        Assessing health-related quality of life in patients with breast cancer: a systematic and standardized comparison of available instruments using the EMPRO tool.
        Qual Life Res. 2016; 25: 2467-2480
      1. Comprehensive Cancer Center the Netherlands (IKNL). Dutch cancer figures. www.cijfersoverkanker.nl.

        • Comprehensive Cancer Center the Netherlands (IKNL)
        Breast Cancer Guideline.
        (Report; available from:) NABON, 2012
        • Peel A.B.
        • Thomas S.M.
        • Dittus K.
        • Jones L.W.
        • Lakoski S.G.
        Cardiorespiratory fitness in breast cancer patients: a call for normative values.
        J Am Heart Assoc. 2014; 3e000432
        • Casla S.
        • Lopez-Tarruella S.
        • Jerez Y.
        • et al.
        Supervised physical exercise improves VO2max, quality of life, and health in early stage breast cancer patients: a randomized controlled trial.
        Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015; 153: 371-382
        • Shephard R.J.
        Independence: a new reason for recommending regular exercise to your patients.
        Phys Sportsmed. 2009; 37: 115-118
        • Freedson P.S.
        • Melanson E.
        • Sirard J.
        Calibration of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. accelerometer.
        Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998; 30: 777-781
        • Matthew C.E.
        Calibration of accelerometer output for adults.
        Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005; 37: S512-S522
        • American College of Sports Medicine
        ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription. 9th edition. Wolters Kluwer, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2014
        • Sabiston C.M.
        • Brunet J.
        • Vallance J.K.
        • Meterissian S.
        Prospective examination of objectively assessed physical activity and sedentary time after breast cancer treatment: sitting on the crest of the teachable moment.
        Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014; 23: 1324-1330
        • Thraen-Borowski K.M.
        • Gennuso K.P.
        • Cadmus-Bertram L.
        Accelerometer-derived physical activity and sedentary time by cancer type in the United States.
        PLoS One. 2017; 12e0182554
        • Ozemek C.
        • Cochran H.L.
        • Strath S.J.
        • Byun W.
        • Kaminsky L.A.
        Estimating relative intensity using individualized accelerometer cutpoints: the importance of fitness level.
        BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013; 13: 53
        • Haskell W.L.
        • Lee I.M.
        • Pate R.R.
        • et al.
        Physical activity and public health: updated recommendation for adults from the American college of sports medicine and the American heart association.
        Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007; 39: 1423-1434
        • Miller N.E.
        • Strath S.J.
        • Swartz A.M.
        • Cashin S.E.
        Estimating absolute and relative physical activity intensity across age via accelerometry in adults.
        J Aging Phys Act. 2010; 18: 158-170
        • McMurray R.G.
        • Soares J.
        • Caspersen C.J.
        • McCurdy T.
        Examining variations of resting metabolic rate of adults: a public health perspective.
        Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014; 46: 1352-1358
        • Trinh L.
        • Motl R.W.
        • Roberts S.A.
        • Gibbons T.
        • McAuley E.
        Estimation of physical activity intensity cut-points using accelerometry in breast cancer survivors and age-matched controls.
        Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2019; ([Epub ahead of print])e13090https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.13090
        • Crouter S.E.
        • Clowers K.G.
        • Bassett D.R.
        A novel method for using accelerometer data to predict energy expenditure.
        J Appl Physiol. 2006; 100: 1324-1331
        • Durnin J.V.
        • Womersley J.
        Body fat assessed from total body density and its estimation from skinfold thickness: measurements on 481 men and women aged from 16 to 72 years.
        Br J Nutr. 1974; 32: 77-97
        • Ainsworth B.E.
        • Haskell W.L.
        • Herrmann S.D.
        • et al.
        2011 compendium of physical activities: a second update of codes and MET values.
        Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011; 43: 1575-1581
        • Balady G.J.
        • Arena R.
        • Sietsema K.
        • et al.
        Clinician’s guide to cardiopulmonary exercise testing in adults: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.
        Circulation. 2010; 122: 191-225
        • Figueroa-Colon R.
        • Hunter G.R.
        • Mayo M.S.
        • Aldridge R.A.
        • Goran M.I.
        • Weinsier R.L.
        Reliability of treadmill measures and criteria to determine VO2max in prepubertal girls.
        Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000; 32: 865-869
        • Taylor C.
        • Nichols S.
        • Ingle L.
        A clinician’s guide to cardiopulmonary exercise testing 1: an introduction.
        Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2015; 76: 192-195
        • Herman Hansen B.
        • Bortnes I.
        • Hildebrand M.
        • Holme I.
        • Kolle E.
        • Anderssen S.A.
        Validity of the ActiGraph GT1M during walking and cycling.
        J Sports Sci. 2014; 32: 510-516
        • Bozdogan H.
        Model selection and akaike information criterion (Aic) - the general-theory and its analytical extensions.
        Psychometrika. 1987; 52: 345-370
        • Burnham K.P.
        • Anderson D.R.
        Multimodel inference - understanding AIC and BIC in model selection.
        Sociol Methods Res. 2004; 33: 261-304
        • Herdy A.H.
        • Uhlendorf D.
        Reference values for cardiopulmonary exercise testing for sedentary and active men and women.
        Arq Bras Cardiol. 2011; 96: 54-59
        • Healy G.N.
        • Dunstan D.W.
        • Salmon J.
        • et al.
        Objectively measured light-intensity physical activity is independently associated with 2-h plasma glucose.
        Diabetes Care. 2007; 30: 1384-1389
        • Crouter S.E.
        • DellaValle D.M.
        • Haas J.D.
        • Frongillo E.A.
        • Bassett D.R.
        Validity of ActiGraph 2-regression model, Matthews cut-points, and NHANES cut-points for assessing free-living physical activity.
        J Phys Act Health. 2013; 10: 504-514