Differential recovery rates of fitness following U.S. Army Ranger training

Published:December 17, 2019DOI:



      To investigate tactically-related physical performance and body composition recovery following U.S. Army Ranger training.


      Prospective cohort.


      Physical performance was comprehensively assessed using a tactically-related performance battery (i.e., Ranger Athlete Warrior assessment) in 10 male Soldiers at baseline (BL) two-weeks (P1), and six-weeks (P2) post-Ranger School. Body composition was determined using DXA. A one-way repeated measures ANOVA was used followed by Bonferroni-adjusted pairwise comparisons when group differences existed (p ≤ 0.05). Pearson correlation coefficients were used to establish associations between changes in fitness and body composition.


      All performance domains except the bench press and deadlift worsened following training. Speed/mobility (Illinois agility test, seconds – BL: 16.20 ± 0.86 vs. P2: 18.66 ± 2.09), anaerobic capacity (300-yard shuttle run, seconds – BL: 62.95 ± 6.17 vs. P2: 67.23 ± 5.91), core strength (heel clap, repetitions – BL: 15.80 ± 4.08 vs. P2: 11.50 ± 4.95), and aerobic endurance (beep test, stage – BL: 9.95 ± 2.18 vs. P2: 7.55 ± 1.07) had not recovered by P2. Only upper body muscular endurance and strength (metronome push-up and pull-up, respectively) were similar to BL by P2. Percent body fat increased from 15.62 ± 3.94 (BL) to 19.33 ± 2.99 (P2) (p < 0.001). There were no significant associations between changes in body composition and performance.


      A comprehensive characterization of physical performance and body composition revealed Rangers did not experience full recovery of fitness six weeks after training. Optimal recovery strategies are needed to return Soldiers to a state of readiness following arduous training.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Nindl B.C.
        • Alvar B.A.
        • Dudley J R.
        • et al.
        Executive summary from the National Strength and Conditioning Association’s second blue ribbon panel on military physical readiness: military physical performance testing.
        J Strength Cond Res. 2015; 29: S216
        • Barringer N.D.
        • McKinnon C.J.
        • O’Brien N.C.
        • et al.
        Relationship of strength and conditioning metrics to success on the army ranger physical assessment test.
        J Strength Cond Res. 2019; 33: 958
        • Henning P.C.
        • Scofield D.E.
        • Spiering B.A.
        • et al.
        Recovery of endocrine and inflammatory mediators following an extended energy deficit.
        J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014; 99: 956-964
        • Moore R.J.
        • Friedl K.E.
        • Kramer T.R.
        • et al.
        Changes in Soldiers Nutritional Status & Immune Function During the Ranger Training Course.
        Army Research Inst of Environmental Medicine, Natick Ma1992 (. Accessed 12 March 2019)
        • Nindl B.C.
        • Barnes B.R.
        • Alemany J.A.
        • et al.
        Physiological consequences of U.S. Army Ranger training.
        Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007; 39: 1380-1387
        • Friedl K.E.
        • Moore R.J.
        • Hoyt R.W.
        • et al.
        Endocrine markers of semistarvation in healthy lean men in a multistressor environment.
        J Appl Physiol. 2000; 88: 1820-1830
        • Shippee R.
        • Askew E.W.
        • Bernton E.
        • et al.
        Nutritional and Immunological Assessment of Ranger Students with Increased Caloric Intake.
        Army Research Inst of Environmental Medicine, Natick Ma1994 (. Accessed 12 March 2019)
      1. Fort Benning. Student Information. Accessed 12 March 2019.

        • Friedl K.E.
        • Moore R.J.
        • Martinez-Lopez L.E.
        • et al.
        Lower limit of body fat in healthy active men.
        J Appl Physiol (Bethesda, Md 1985). 1994; 77: 933-940
      2. RAW PT, v.4.0. Accessed 12 March 2019.

        • Raya M.A.
        • Gailey R.S.
        • Gaunaurd I.A.
        • et al.
        Comparison of three agility tests with male servicemembers: Edgren Side Step Test, T-Test, and Illinois Agility Test.
        J Rehabil Res Dev. 2013; 50: 951-960
        • Hachana Y.
        • Chaabène H.
        • Nabli M.A.
        • et al.
        Test-retest reliability, criterion-related validity, and minimal detectable change of the Illinois agility test in male team sport athletes.
        J Strength Cond Res. 2013; 27: 2752-2759
        • Blount E.M.
        • Ringleb S.I.
        • Tolk A.
        • et al.
        Incorporation of physical fitness in a tactical infantry simulation.
        J Def Model Simul. 2013; 10: 235-246
        • Léger L.A.
        • Mercier D.
        • Gadoury C.
        • et al.
        The multistage 20 metre shuttle run test for aerobic fitness.
        J Sports Sci. 1988; 6: 93-101
        • Léger L.A.
        • Lambert J.
        A maximal multistage 20-m shuttle run test to predict VO2 max.
        Eur J Appl Physiol. 1982; 49: 1-12
        • Aandstad A.
        • Holme I.
        • Berntsen S.
        • et al.
        Validity and reliability of the 20 meter shuttle run test in military personnel.
        Mil Med. 2011; 176: 513-518
        • Shepherd J.A.
        • Fan B.
        • Lu Y.
        • et al.
        A multinational study to develop universal standardization of whole-body bone density and composition using GE Healthcare Lunar and Hologic DXA systems.
        J Bone Miner Res. 2012; 27: 2208-2216
        • Marinangeli C.P.
        • Kassis A.N.
        Use of dual X-ray absorptiometry to measure body mass during short- to medium-term trials of nutrition and exercise interventions.
        Nutr Rev. 2013; 71: 332-342
      3. Harman EA, Frykman PN The relationship of body size and composition to the performance of physically demanding military tasks. Body composition and physical performance. Published 24 February1992. Accessed 12 March 2019.

        • Nindl B.C.
        • Billing D.C.
        • Drain J.R.
        • et al.
        Perspectives on resilience for military readiness and preparedness: report of an international military physiology roundtable.
        J Sci Med Sport. 2018; 21: 1116-1124
        • Friedl K.E.
        • Knapik J.J.
        • Häkkinen K.
        • et al.
        Perspectives on aerobic and strength influences on military physical readiness: report of an international military physiology roundtable.
        J Strength Cond Res. 2015; 29: S10-S23
        • Billing D.C.
        • Silk A.J.
        • Tofari P.J.
        • et al.
        Effects of military load carriage on susceptibility to enemy fire during tactical combat movements.
        J Strength Cond Res. 2015; 29: S134-S138
        • Angeltveit A.
        • Paulsen G.
        • Solberg P.A.
        • et al.
        Validity, reliability, and performance determinants of a new job-specific anaerobic work capacity test for the Norwegian Navy Special Operations Command.
        J Strength Cond Res. 2016; 30: 487-496
        • Huang H.-C.
        • Nagai T.
        • Lovalekar M.
        • et al.
        Physical fitness predictors of a warrior task simulation test.
        J Strength Cond Res. 2018; 32: 2562-2568
        • Nindl B.C.
        • Friedl K.E.
        • Marchitelli L.J.
        • et al.
        Regional fat placement in physically fit males and changes with weight loss.
        Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1996; 28: 786-793
        • Nindl B.C.
        • Friedl K.E.
        • Frykman P.N.
        • et al.
        Physical performance and metabolic recovery among lean, healthy men following a prolonged energy deficit.
        Int J Sports Med. 1997; 18: 317-324
        • Jones B.H.
        • Hauret K.G.
        • Dye S.K.
        • et al.
        Impact of physical fitness and body composition on injury risk among active young adults: a study of Army trainees.
        J Sci Med Sport. 2017; 20: S17-S22
        • Teyhen D.S.
        • Shaffer S.W.
        • Butler R.J.
        • et al.
        What risk factors are associated with musculoskeletal injury in US Army Rangers? A prospective prognostic study.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015; 473: 2948-2958
        • Leetun D.T.
        • Ireland M.L.
        • Willson J.D.
        • et al.
        Core stability measures as risk factors for lower extremity injury in athletes.
        Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004; 36: 926-934
        • Knapik J.J.
        • Grier T.
        • Spiess A.
        • et al.
        Injury rates and injury risk factors among federal bureau of investigation new agent trainees.
        BMC Public Health. 2011; 11: 920