Our study objectives were twofold: 1) examine whether users and non-users of different types of sport supplements vary in doping attitudes and sport supplement beliefs, and 2) determine whether the type of sport supplement is directly and indirectly (via sport supplement beliefs) related to doping attitudes.
Athletes (N = 557; 77% male, mean ± standard deviation; age = 20.8 ± 4.5 years, training = 5.7 ± 4.2 h per week, competing = 11.1 ± 5.2 years) completed measures of sport supplement use, sport supplement beliefs, and doping attitudes. Sport supplements were classified into: ergogenic, medical, sport food and drinks, and superfoods.
Compared to non-users, users of ergogenic (d = 0.31, p < 0.01) and medical (d = 0.42, p < 0.01) sport supplements reported more favourable attitudes towards doping. In addition, compared to non-users, users of ergogenic (d = 1.10, p < 0.01), medical (d = 0.80, p < 0.01) and sport food/drink (d = 0.58, p < 0.01) supplements reported stronger beliefs in the effectiveness of sport supplements to improve sport performance. Use of ergogenic, medical and sport food/drink supplements was indirectly related to doping attitudes via sport supplement beliefs.
Researchers examining the relationship between sport supplement use and doping should differentiate between sport supplement types to improve measurement accuracy. Sport practitioners administering ergogenic and medical sport supplements to athletes may need to provide additional anti-doping education to counteract any favourable attitudes towards doping.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:Subscribe to Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport
Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
- Athletes and supplements: prevalence and perspectives.Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2018; 28: 126-138
- Gateway to doping? Supplement use in the context of preferred competitive situations, doping attitude, beliefs, and norms.Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2013; 23: 244-252
- Personal and psychosocial predictors of doping use in physical activity settings: a meta-analysis.Sports Med. 2014; 44: 1603-1624
- Doping attitudes and covariates of potential doping behaviour in high-level team-sport athletes; gender specific analysis.J Sports Sci Med. 2016; 15: 606
- Attitudes, beliefs and knowledge related to doping in different categories of football players.J Sci Med Sport. 2019; 22: 981-986
- IOC consensus statement: dietary supplements and the high-performance athlete.Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2018; 28: 104-125
- Dietary supplements and elite athletes: when nature becomes high risk.Curr Opin Endocr Metab Res. 2019; 9: 66-73
- Heavy resistance training and supplementation with the alleged testosterone booster nmda has no effect on body composition, muscle performance, and serum hormones associated with the hypothalamo-pituitary-gonadal axis in resistance-trained males.J Sports Sci Med. 2014; 13: 192
- The doping mindset—part I: implications of the functional use theory on mental representations of doping.Perform Enhanc Health. 2013; 2: 153-163
- Can we better integrate the role of anti-doping in sports and society? A psychological approach to contemporary value-based prevention.Acute Topics in Anti-Dopinged. Karger Publishers, 2017
- Sport supplement use predicts doping via sport supplement beliefs.J Sports Sci. 2019; : 1-7
- Measuring explicit attitude toward doping: review of the psychometric properties of the performance enhancement attitude scale.Psychol Sport Exerc. 2009; 10: 390-396
- Sports foods and dietary supplements for optimal function and performance enhancement in track-and-field athletes.Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2019; 29: 198-209
- A confirmatory factor analysis of the performance enhancement attitude scale for adult and adolescent athletes.Psychol Sport Exerc. 2017; 28: 100-104
- Measuring attitude toward doping: Further evidence for the psychometric properties of the performance enhancement attitude scale.in: 14th Congress of the European Association for Sport Management, Nicosia, Cyprus2006
- Development and validation of the Sports Supplements Beliefs Scale.Perf Enhanc Health. 2017; 5: 89-97
- Careless responding in questionnaire measures: detection, impact, and remedies.Leadership Q. 2020; 101384
- A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values.J Am Stat Assoc. 1988; 83: 1198-1202
- Flexible Imputation of Missing Data.CRC Press, 2018
- Multiple imputation of missing values.Stata J. 2004; 4: 227-241
- Missing data and multiple imputation in clinical epidemiological research.Clin Epidemiol. 2017; 9: 157
Lenhard W., Lenhard A. Calculation of effect sizes. https://www.psychometrica.de/effect_size.html.
- A power primer.Psychol Bull. 1992; 112: 155-159
- Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach (Methodology in the Social Sciences).Guilford-Press, New York, NY2013
- Effect size guidelines for individual differences researchers.Pers Individ Dif. 2016; 102: 74-78
- Effect size measures for mediation models: quantitative strategies for communicating indirect effects.Psychol Methods. 2011; 16: 93-115
- Prevalence of dietary supplement use by athletes: systematic review and meta-analysis.Sports Med. 2016; 46: 103-123
- Evaluation of UK athletics clean sport programme in preventing doping in junior elite athletes.Perform Enhanc Health. 2020;
Published online: September 22, 2020
Accepted: September 14, 2020
Received in revised form: August 18, 2020
Received: May 15, 2020
© 2020 Sports Medicine Australia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.