Advertisement
Original research| Volume 25, ISSUE 6, P486-491, June 2022

Download started.

Ok

The exchange of health and performance information when transitioning from club to National football teams: A Delphi survey of National team practitioners

      Abstract

      Objectives

      To establish agreement in National team contexts when players transition from club to National team about (i) what medical and physical information to collect, (ii) how to use information (iii) identifying challenges to collection and (iv) collection methods.

      Design

      Delphi survey.

      Methods

      A series of sequential online questionnaires were sent to heads of medical and performance of the 32 National teams following the FIFA 2018 World Cup. Two separate Delphi's; ‘Medical’ and ‘Physical’ were administered. The ‘Medical’ respondent was the person responsible for player health. ‘Physical’ referred to the person responsible for physical performance. Content analyses were performed, with subsequent rounds designed according to responses of the previous. Agreement was considered at ≥70%.

      Results

      Twenty-three Medical (72%) and 14 (44%) Physical heads participated in Round 1 (3 rounds total). Seventeen Medical and 12 Physical respondents completed all rounds. Medical information agreed upon injury epidemiology, screening and injury treatment strategies. Physical information included training/match-loads, fatigue, wellness and current exercise programmes. Both Medical and Physical agreed information should be used to plan and individualise player programmes. Additionally medical information should guide coaches' national team selection. Communication, willingness to share and quality/completeness of information were agreed as main challenges. Medical and Physical respondents agreed a standardised reporting form and electronic shared database as best option to collect information.

      Conclusions

      Our findings highlight the importance of health and performance information exchange between national and club teams. Further, this exchange should be cooperative, symbiotic and a two-way process to assist with improving player health.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • McCall A.
        • Davison M.
        • Andersen T.E.
        • et al.
        Injury prevention strategies at the FIFA 2014 World Cup: perceptions and practices of the physicians from the 32 participating national teams.
        Br J Sports Med. 2015; 49: 603-608https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2015-094747
        • McCall AD M.
        • Bizzini M.
        • Dvorak J.
        Injury Prevention Strategies in Female Senior and Male Junior International Players: Surveys.
        (Unpublished, Internal)2015–2017
        • McCall A.
        • Jones M.
        • Gelis L.
        • et al.
        Monitoring loads and non-contact injury during the transition from club to National team prior to an international football tournament: a case study of the 2014 FIFA World Cup and 2015 Asia Cup.
        J Sci Med Sport. 2018; 21: 800-804https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2017.12.002
        • Noor D.
        • McCall A.
        • Jones M.
        • et al.
        Transitioning from club to national teams: training and match load profiles of international footballers.
        J Sci Med Sport. 2019; 22: 948-954https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2019.02.006
        • Minas H.
        • Jorm A.F.
        Where there is no evidence: use of expert consensus methods to fill the evidence gap in low-income countries and cultural minorities.
        Int J Ment Health Syst. 2010; 4: 33https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-4458-4-33
        • Loo R.
        The Delphi method: a powerful tool for strategic management.
        Policing. 2002; 25: 762-769
        • Slade S.C.
        • Dionne C.E.
        • Underwood M.
        • et al.
        Standardised method for reporting exercise programmes: protocol for a modified Delphi study.
        BMJ Open. 2014; 4e006682https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006682
        • Côté J.S.J.
        • Baria A.
        • Russell S.J.
        Organizing and interpreting unstructured qualitative data.
        Sport Psychol. 1993; 7: 127-137
        • Kleynen M.
        • Braun S.M.
        • Bleijlevens M.H.
        • et al.
        Using a Delphi technique to seek consensus regarding definitions, descriptions and classification of terms related to implicit and explicit forms of motor learning.
        PLoS One. 2014; 9e100227https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0100227
        • M P
        Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods.
        third ed. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks2002
        • van der Horst N.
        • Backx F.
        • Goedhart E.A.
        • et al.
        Return to play after hamstring injuries in football (soccer): a worldwide Delphi procedure regarding definition, medical criteria and decision-making.
        Br J Sports Med. 2017; 51: 1583-1591https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2016-097206
        • McCall A.
        • Carling C.
        • Nedelec M.
        • et al.
        Risk factors, testing and preventative strategies for non-contact injuries in professional football: current perceptions and practices of 44 teams from various premier leagues.
        Br J Sports Med. 2014; 48: 1352-1357https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2014-093439
        • McCall A.
        • Dupont G.
        • Ekstrand J.
        Injury prevention strategies, coach compliance and player adherence of 33 of the UEFA Elite Club Injury Study teams: a survey of teams’ head medical officers.
        Br J Sports Med. 2016; 50: 725-730https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2015-095259
        • International Olympic Committee I, Illness Epidemiology Consensus G
        • Bahr R.
        • et al.
        International Olympic Committee consensus statement: methods for recording and reporting of epidemiological data on injury and illness in sports 2020 (including the STROBE Extension for Sports Injury and Illness Surveillance (STROBE-SIIS)).
        Orthop J Sports Med. 2020; 8 (2325967120902908)https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967120902908
        • Bahr R.
        Why screening tests to predict injury do not work-and probably never will…: a critical review.
        Br J Sports Med. 2016; 50: 776-780https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2016-096256
        • Nyland J.
        • Nolan M.F.
        Therapeutic modality: rehabilitation of the injured athlete.
        Clin Sports Med. 2004; 23 (vii): 299-313
        • Akenhead R.
        • Nassis G.P.
        Training load and player monitoring in high-level football: current practice and perceptions.
        Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2016; 11: 587-593https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2015-0331
        • Thorpe R.T.
        • Strudwick A.J.
        • Buchheit M.
        • et al.
        Tracking morning fatigue status across in-season training weeks in elite soccer players.
        Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2016; 11: 947-952https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2015-0490
        • Jeffries A.C.
        • Wallace L.
        • Coutts A.J.
        • et al.
        Athlete-reported outcome measures for monitoring training responses: a systematic review of risk of bias and measurement property quality according to the COSMIN Guidelines.
        Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2020; 21: 1-13https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2020-0386
        • Duignan C.
        • Doherty C.
        • Caulfield B.
        • et al.
        Single-item self-report measures of team-sport athlete wellbeing and their relationship with training load: a systematic review.
        J Athl Train. 2020; 55: 944-953https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-0528.19
        • Reilly T.
        • Morris T.
        • Whyte G.
        The specificity of training prescription and physiological assessment: a review.
        J Sports Sci. 2009; 27: 575-589https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410902729741
        • Pereira Gray D.J.
        • Sidaway-Lee K.
        • White E.
        • et al.
        Continuity of care with doctors-a matter of life and death? A systematic review of continuity of care and mortality.
        BMJ Open. 2018; 8e021161https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021161
        • Impellizzeri FMC A.J.
        • Fanchini M.
        • McCall A.
        Injuries in football: it’s time to stop chasing the training load unicorn.
        Footb Med Perform. 2020; : 11-15
        • Lewis N.A.C.D.
        • Pedlar C.R.
        • Rogers J.P.
        Can clinicians and scientists explain and prevent unexplained underperformance syndrome in elite athletes: an interdisciplinary perspective and 2016 update.
        BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2015; 1e000063https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2015-000063
        • Hagglund M.
        • Walden M.
        • Magnusson H.
        • et al.
        Injuries affect team performance negatively in professional football: an 11-year follow-up of the UEFA Champions League injury study.
        Br J Sports Med. 2013; 47: 738-742https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2013-092215
        • Ekstrand J.
        • Lundqvist D.
        • Davison M.
        • et al.
        Communication quality between the medical team and the head coach/manager is associated with injury burden and player availability in elite football clubs.
        Br J Sports Med. 2019; 53: 304-308https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2018-099411
        • Hersh W.R.
        • Totten A.M.
        • Eden K.B.
        • et al.
        Outcomes from health information exchange: systematic review and future research needs.
        JMIR Med Inform. 2015; 3: e39https://doi.org/10.2196/medinform.5215
        • Weitzman E.R.
        • Kelemen S.
        • Kaci L.
        • et al.
        Willingness to share personal health record data for care improvement and public health: a survey of experienced personal health record users.
        BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012; 12: 39https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-12-39
        • Cresswell K.M.
        • Sheikh A.
        Health information technology in hospitals: current issues and future trends.
        Future Hosp J. 2015; 2: 50-56https://doi.org/10.7861/futurehosp.2-1-50
        • Schade C.P.
        • Sullivan F.M.
        • de Lusignan S.
        • et al.
        e-Prescribing, efficiency, quality: lessons from the computerization of UK family practice.
        J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006; 13: 470-475https://doi.org/10.1197/jamia.M2041